• Samuel at Gilgal

    This year I will be sharing brief excerpts from the articles, sermons, and books I am currently reading. My posts will not follow a regular schedule but will be published as I find well-written thoughts that should be of interest to maturing Christian readers. Whenever possible, I encourage you to go to the source and read the complete work of the author.

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,396,175 Visits
  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,267 other subscribers
  • December 2012
    M T W T F S S
  • Recommended Reading

The New Holy Days

Christmas is rapidly becoming an entirely secular holiday. There is a revolution taking over the minds and hearts of Americans which is pushing Christianity out of Christmas. Dr. Benjamin Wiker writes:

Admit it. Christmastime has been taken over, co-opted and transformed into something entirely different. We all know it. We crab about it. We dread the coming of Christmas. We shudder to watch video snatches of vulgar mobs in Walmart on Black Friday crushing, slamming, pushing, cursing, and trampling each other for cell phones or big screen TVs.

Christmas does not bring peace to our earth. Stories on the internet report that almost half of us would rather we skipped the whole thing. By the time the very day of Christmas rolls around, we are dead sick of it, our only consolation being that we won’t have to hear “Jingle Bell Rock,” “Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer,” or “Have a Holly Jolly Christmas” until…October? September? Perhaps it will be August next year.

How could this happen to the time that Christians had so carefully marked out for preparing the faithful to celebrate the birth of Christ, the incarnation of God, all that the soul longs for? How could this preparation time have been so thoroughly transformed that we are sick of Christmas on the very day of its arrival?

Again, we crab about it. But this year, we really need to think deeply about it because a whole lot, indeed everything, is at stake. . . .

Continue reading this article here. . . .

Evolution or Design? Part IV

Science and Evolution:

(Continued from yesterday. . . .) The evidence clearly teaches us that we have a complex universe! Let us look at another required element in the argument for evolution. Is the smallest matter assembled in a random way or is it specifically ordered and organized in a required way? Random chance is not only an inadequate explanation of simple proteins; it cannot explain the existence of the smallest cells. Look at the simplest amoeba cell which is made up of about 2000 proteins. The odds of this kind of organism arising randomly are one chance in 10 to the 40,000th power! The odds of catching a single specific atom out of the entire universe are only 1 in 10 to the 80th power! Imagine just how impossible it is to form an amoeba! When Sir Fred Hoyle realized this fact, he said that the odds of random assembly are “enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.” Therefore, the argument for design provides a better hypothesis for the creation of life than Darwin’s ill-informed conclusions. To God be the Glory!

According to Charles Darwin:

“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would break down.”

Christianity and Mithraism

When I was in college, I wrote a paper on Mithraism for a course dealing with ancient religions. At that time I was interested in the “similarities” Mithraism seemed to have, according to the text I was studying, (information greatly exaggerated) with Christianity. Even today, there are many who attempt to build a false connection between Mithra and Jesus. Such assertions abound in literature critical of Christianity. I hope the following information will help you if you are ever confronted with these claims.

Those who claim there is a connection between Mithraism and Christianity are really trying to restructure Mithraism according to their own preconceived ideas. There are no existing texts that come from the ancient followers of this belief system. There are, however, artifacts found in caves and references from some historians that prove it did exist. The artifacts have been dated to at least 60 or 70 years after the beginning of Christianity. Many believe they are more likely from the middle of the second century.

There were two forms of Mithraism: Roman Mithraism and Iranian Mithraism. These two forms of Mithraism are connected by little more than the name. Roman Mithraism was pretty much a new creation (influenced by the Greeks) which was very popular among the military. It seems probable that its followers adopted some Christian ideas along the way.

The birth of Mithras was celebrated on the Winter solstice and eventually on December 25th. The ancient church knew that Jesus was not born on December 25th (perhaps in September or October?), but chose December 25th as the day of His birth’s celebration. This action was an assertive move of the church to wipe out the pagan celebrations that took place at this time of year.

None of the available records from historians of this time period show that the pagan god Mithras was ever a teacher. Mithras did not have twelve disciples and he had no bodily resurrection. Mithras was born out of solid rock; not a virgin woman. Mithras is recorded as having battled with the sun and a primeval bull. Mithras killed the bull, which then became the ground of life for the human race.

Mithraism was truly a bloody cult. To achieve a higher level in Mithraism, followers had to stand under a bull while it was slain so they could be bathed in its blood and guts. Then they’d join the others in eating the bull. They were literally washed in the blood of the bull. Christians, on the other hand, thought of themselves as ‘washed… in the blood of the Lamb’ (Revelation 7:14).” Christian baptism involves water, not blood!

Mithras is totally a mythological creature, and not a historical person. On the other hand, Jesus is a historical person. Along with the twenty seven New Testament documents, which are continually affirmed by historical data and archaeological research, we have the testimony of the early church fathers, along with a few non-Christian sources, such as Suetonius, Pliny the Younger, Flavius Josephus, and others. We have more historical documents which make mention of Jesus and the events of His life and death (along with references to His follower’s claim of His resurrection) than we do for Tiberius Caesar.

Yet, it is the nature of mankind to suppress the truth of Christ to have their own way (Romans 1:18-23). Many will grasp at any straw to disgrace the name of Jesus. History has often been rewritten with the intention of such consequences. In the instance of Mithraism, we find another attempt to reinvent a pagan cult as the source of Christian practices. Remember this warning from Paul to those who “refused to love the truth and so be saved”: “Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, for all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 ESV)

I would like to recommend for further reading:

“Refuting Mithras Myth Parallelism To Christianity” by Prayson Daniel and Ronald Nash’s “Seven Arguments Against Christian Dependence of The Mysteries” which may be found in Daniel’s article.

%d bloggers like this: