An investigation into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by the InterAcademy Council (IAC) found there was “little evidence” for its claims about global warming. Basically, there is little proof for their wild assertions.
Climate change skeptic David Holland, who challenged leading climate change scientists at the University of East Anglia to disclose their research, believes the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is definitely not fit for its purpose.
The IAC said: “The IPCC needs to reform its management structure and strengthen its procedures to handle ever larger and increasingly complex climate assessments as well as the more intense public scrutiny coming from a world grappling with how to respond to climate change.”
The review also cast doubt on the future of IPCC chairman Dr Rajendra Pachauri. The Daily Express reported how he had no climate science qualifications. Dr Pachauri has also been accused of a conflict of interest, after it emerged that he has business interests attracting millions of pounds in funding.
Read more about this subject. . . .
Filed under: Education, Politics, Sermon | Tagged: Climate change, Climate Change: The Ipcc Response Strategies, Environment, Global Warming, Global warming, InterAcademy Panel on International Issues, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, News, PC Professors, Politics, Pseudo-Science, Rajendra K. Pachauri, University of East Anglia |
Samuel at Gilgal 
Yeah, I’d rather trust Rupert Murdoch about an issue that will destroy all life on earth…
LikeLike