Samuel at Gilgal

1 Samuel 13 & 15

Would Jesus Christ Torture Terrorists?

World Trade CenterFrom: The Pen of Gary Bauer

I was interviewed last week by the Associated Press on torture from a Christian perspective. The question breathlessly being asked by people who normally say that religion should have no role in public policy is, “Would Christ torture?” (Funny how they now want to ask what Jesus would do.) I suggested the more accurate question is what would Christ have us do in situations filled with moral ambiguity. If we have a terrorist in our custody who we believe has knowledge of literally a “ticking bomb” that will kill thousands of innocent people in a U.S. city, what can we legitimately do, both legally and morally, to get the information? Some on the religious left and virtually everyone on the political left are suggesting we can do nothing other than provide the prisoner with a Koran, an ACLU attorney, three square religiously approved meals and a sleep comfort mattress and hope he is so overwhelmed by our kindness that he gives us the information we need.

I disagree. I think it is legally permissible and morally required that we employ physical and mental stress to save our fellow citizens. I think it would be morally obscene to give greater weight to the prisoner’s comfort than to the lives of our fellow Americans. We have a moral obligation to defend the weak and innocent from thugs, criminals and terrorists.

The left wing blogosphere is in meltdown over my comments. MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann has once again named me as one of the three “worst people in the world.” To which I respond: “Bring it on!” Between the choice of saving an innocent American and giving foreign terrorists constitutional rights, I’ll choose saving the American every time.

May 20, 2009 - Posted by Samuel | Christianity, Politics, Religion, Worldview | | 3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. oh god please come again with a new reincarnation to save your garden

    Comment by aree dewan | June 11, 2009

  2. Gary, we have never captured a terrorist with literal knowledge of a ticking bomb that would kill thousands of Americans, so what is the point of the hypothetical? By setting up a straw man, you justify the torture of many real men.

    Comment by lymond crawford | July 16, 2009

  3. Mental and physical stress are quite different from torture, and to comfort an enemy may not be the best choice in this situation. One must remember that, under these circumstances, it would be best to follow the judgement of the heart and not that of the corrupted mind. If I was set in the posistion of interrogating the suspected terrorist, constant questioning, mental stress, and guilt over what the terrorist was attempting would be the tactics of choice.

    Comment by saint | July 20, 2009


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.